Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Hazem Naow vs Maik Steiner Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Naow vs Steiner analysis and find out who is favored!
Hazem Naow vs Maik Steiner Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Naow 1 - 0 Steiner
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Naow has won 49.13% of points on their second serve, while Steiner has won 53.98%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Naow, in recent form, has won 56.49% of their opponent's second serve points, while Steiner has won 51.6%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.36% and 33.37% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Naow has saved 62.7% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Steiner has saved 70.45% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Naow has won 69.14% of matches played (W/L 56/ 25), with Steiner winning 55.74% (W/L 34/ 27) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Naow has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 71% (W/L 65/ 27), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 55/ 38). Steiner has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 92/ 61), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 2/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Naow has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 73.08% of matches (W/L 38/ 14), where as Steiner has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 55.74% of matches (W/L 34/ 27). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Naow winning 1 times and Steiner being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Naow winning 2 and Steiner winning 0. The last match between Naow and Steiner was at the M15 Doha, 29-12-2021, First, Hard with Hazem Naow getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:29:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Naow and Steiner have played a deciding set 0 times, with Naow winning 0 times and Steiner 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Naow winning 0, and Steiner 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Naow has played against opponents with an average rank of 181.72 while Steiner has played against players with an average rank of 98.39.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Naow has won 65% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Steiner has won 40% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Naow has converted 43.52% of breakpoint opportunities, and Steiner has converted 42.47% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
343
Rank
323
High
24
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
843
Rank
843
High
29
Age
Plays
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
Form
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
66% (152-80)
Career Total W/L
59% (176-121)
73% (27-10)
YTD W/L
69% (24-11)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Hazem Naow | Maik Steiner |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 7 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:29:0 | 1:29:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (36/54) | 56% (35/63) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 69% (25/36) | 69% (24/35) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 72% (13/18) | 46% (13/28) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 38% (3/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 41% (26/63) | 30% (16/54) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-3 |
Stats 
Hazem Naow
Player
Maik Steiner
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
63)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
64
Total Points Won
53
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Hazem Naow | Maik Steiner |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 73% (27/10) | 69% (24/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 67% (56/27) | 68% (56/26) |
| Games Win/Loss | 56% (424/337) | 58% (444/325) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 71% (17/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 67% (8/4) | 63% (5/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 76% (19/6) | 67% (2/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.21 | 0.6 |
| Aces Total | 77 | 224 |
| DFs per game | 0.36 | 0.1 |
| DFs Total | 133 | 38 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:37:3 | 1:42:39 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 250.19 | 83.49 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (1595/2525) | 66% (1538/2335) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (1105/1595) | 74% (1132/1538) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (456/930) | 54% (432/797) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (126/290) | 44% (106/243) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (1067/2489) | 41% (986/2424) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 71% (15/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 80% (12/3) | 69% (24/11) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 73% (27/37) | 69% (24/35) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 62% (8/13) |
| Deciding Set W% | 78% (7/9) | 33% (4/12) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (23/23) | 91% (23/21) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (23/0) | 9% (23/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 29% (14/4) | 25% (12/3) |
Hazem Naow Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Federico Iannaccone
Player
Hazem Naow
95%
(
54 of
57)
1st Serve %
69%
(
37 of
54)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
33%
(
1 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hazem Naow
Player
Nicolas Alvarez Varona
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
85%
(
52 of
61)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
19 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Riccardo Bonadio
Player
Hazem Naow
50%
(
24 of
48)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
74)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
9
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
26%
(
5 of
19)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
40 of
74)
73
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Henri Squire
Player
Hazem Naow
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
59%
(
24 of
41)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
56
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Buvaysar Gadamauri
Player
Hazem Naow
66%
(
66 of
100)
1st Serve %
67%
(
51 of
76)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
39%
(
39 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
28 of
76)
89
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hazem Naow
Player
Mae Malige
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
36%
(
15 of
42)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hazem Naow
Player
Dario Huber
63%
(
64 of
102)
1st Serve %
56%
(
53 of
95)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
6
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
14 of
42)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
37%
(
38 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
95)
106
Total Points Won
91
|
4-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gregoire Barrere
Player
Hazem Naow
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
74%
(
32 of
43)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
50
Total Points Won
42
|
7-5 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hazem Naow
Player
Michael Geerts
66%
(
69 of
105)
1st Serve %
66%
(
64 of
97)
8
Aces
11
7
Double Faults
2
75%
(
52 of
69)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
46 of
64)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
33%
(
35 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
35 of
97)
105
Total Points Won
97
|
4-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hazem Naow
Player
Eliakim Coulibaly
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
75%
(
41 of
55)
4
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
1
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
21 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Maik Steiner Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Philip Henning
Player
Maik Steiner
73%
(
61 of
84)
1st Serve %
67%
(
56 of
84)
5
Aces
12
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
48 of
61)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
41 of
56)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
25 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
29 of
84)
88
Total Points Won
80
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maik Steiner
Player
Edison Ambarzumjan
68%
(
76 of
111)
1st Serve %
56%
(
69 of
124)
5
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
75%
(
57 of
76)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
43 of
69)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
30%
(
33 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
48 of
124)
126
Total Points Won
109
|
6-7(7) 7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maik Steiner
Player
Siddhant Banthia
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
14
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
86%
(
32 of
37)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
27%
(
15 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Benjamin Lock
Player
Maik Steiner
76%
(
44 of
58)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
10
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
1
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
22%
(
13 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
26 of
65)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maik Steiner
Player
Siddhant Banthia
63%
(
49 of
78)
1st Serve %
54%
(
49 of
91)
13
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
84%
(
41 of
49)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
42 of
49)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
26%
(
20 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
32 of
91)
90
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(7) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maik Steiner
Player
Patrik Oplustil
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
71
Total Points Won
50
|
6-1 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mili Poljicak
Player
Maik Steiner
54%
(
50 of
92)
1st Serve %
64%
(
62 of
97)
7
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
45%
(
19 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
41%
(
38 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
43 of
97)
97
Total Points Won
92
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maik Steiner
Player
Matthias Ujvary
65%
(
48 of
74)
1st Serve %
68%
(
42 of
62)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
36%
(
27 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
77
Total Points Won
59
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Diego Fernandez Flores
Player
Maik Steiner
77%
(
69 of
90)
1st Serve %
72%
(
62 of
86)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
72%
(
50 of
69)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
40 of
62)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
34%
(
31 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
32 of
86)
91
Total Points Won
85
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maik Steiner
Player
Leo Borg
63%
(
48 of
76)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
81)
9
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
37%
(
28 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
44 of
81)
92
Total Points Won
65
|
3-6 6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Naow Vs Steiner Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
